Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Randolph v. O'Brien
as 6:2026cv02990
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Randolph
Defendant:
Ernest Michael Patrick O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
HENNAGIR v. CALHOUN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 5:2026cv00204
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK HENNAGIR
Defendant:
CALHOUN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mashburn v. O'Brien
as 6:2026cv02766
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Mashburn
Defendant:
Ernest Michael Patrick O'Brien, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
(HC) Casey v. Rowe et al
as 2:2026cv02411
Petitioner:
Michael Patrick Casey
Respondent:
Jamal Rowe, Chief Probation Officer and Sacramento County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Casey v. Rowe et al
as 2:2026cv02412
Petitioner:
Michael Patrick Casey
Respondent:
Jamal Rowe, Chief Probation Officer and Sacramento County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cowart v. County of Greenville, The et al
as 6:2026cv02599
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brian Cowart
Defendant:
County of Greenville, The and Ernest Michael Patrick O'Brien, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
USA v. Michael Cates
as 26-5545
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL PATRICK CATES
Spears v. O'Brien
as 6:2026cv02450
Plaintiff:
Ethan Kenneth Spears
Defendant:
Ernest Michael Patrick O'Brien, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Passmore v. Ernest O'Brien
as 26-6673
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICHARD PASSMORE
Defendant:
ERNEST MICHAEL PATRICK O'BRIEN, SR. Greenville SC Magistrate; Judge Code 7185
Cronin et al v. Ritchey et al
as 2:2026cv01246
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Cronin and Melissa Ortiz
Defendant:
Bryan P Ritchey and GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
