Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Vernon Housing Authority et al
as 3:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Vernon Housing Authority, Betsy R. Soto, Wendy Ng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patrick v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Quincy Michael Patrick
Defendant:
John Rodriguez, Wilkes-Barre Township Police Department, Judge Michael J. Dotzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Quincy Patrick v. Kingston Police Department, et al
as 23-1348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCY MICHAEL PATRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
DET. RICHARD KOTCHIN, SCOTT L. RAVERT, JOHN B. and others
Defendant:
RICHARD KOTCHIN
Patrick v. Kingston Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv01167
Plaintiff:
Quincy Michael Patrick
Defendant:
Kingston Police Department, State Parole Scranton, Det. Richard Kotchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Schoonover v. Clay County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2019cv00386
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff's Department, Michael Patrick Morris, Clay County Commission and others
Plaintiff:
James Randy Schoonover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
