Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Michael Patrick Egan v. Maggie M. Wei et al
as 2:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Egan
Defendant:
Maggie M. Wei, Tran B. Locke, Alvin H. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Star News Digital Media, Inc. et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 3:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Star News Digital Media, Inc., Michael Patrick Leahy and Matthew D. Kittle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
USA v. Michael Hernandez
as 22-50167
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL PATRICK HERNANDEZ
Kyros Law Group LLC v. Feeney et al
as 1:2021cv10895
Plaintiff:
Kyros Law Group LLC
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Feeney and Feeney Law Firm
Kennedy v. Lumpkin
as 21-50117
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Patrick Kennedy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Brown v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-253
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert Lee Searight, Beverly Ann Reynolds, Jerry Williams and others
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Niagara Falls, Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., CECOS International, Inc. and others
James Schoonover v. Clay County Sheriff's Dept.
as 20-1680
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PATRICK MORRIS, a deputy sheriff of Clay County, CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a division of the Clay County Commission, JONATHAN HOLCOMB, a deputy sheriff of Clay County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RANDY SCHOONOVER
O'Brien v. Morris
as 2:2020cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jill Ann O'Brien
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Morris
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
