Cases 1 - 10 of 400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
James Malarik, et al v. Beaver County Jail Administrat, et al
as 21-3175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID LYONS, SR. and ERNEST THORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, STEVE COOLEY, RUDOLPH GUILAY and others
Franklin v. United States
as 21-11104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Franklin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States, Charles Rettig, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Michael Pompeo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MALARIK et al v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00839
Defendant:
JAPANESE YAKUZA, MICHAEL POMPEO, BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYONS, SR., JAMES M WHITEY BULGER MALARIK and ERNEST POOH THORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
