Cases 1 - 10 of 18
(PC) Thomas v. Macomber et al
as 1:2026cv01554
Plaintiff:
Craig Arnold Thomas
Defendant:
Jeffrey Macomber, Edward Silva, Neil Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Ruff's Dog Ranch, LLC et al
as 4:2026cv00151
Plaintiff:
Anna Medina
Defendant:
Ruff's Dog Ranch, LLC and Michael Ruff
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Ruff v. Garcia et al
as 6:2025cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Ruff
Defendant:
Garcia and US Marshals Victoria TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Dobbs et al
as 4:2025cv07581
Plaintiff:
Eric Phillips
Defendant:
Diane Dobbs, Angelique Scott, Kathleen OMeara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. San Mateo County et al
as 4:2025cv04879
Plaintiff:
Marion A. Carr
Defendant:
San Mateo County, Board of Parole Hearing, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ruff v. Ryckman et al
as 8:2024cv03663
Defendant:
Pamela Ryckman and Hachette Book Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Ruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
(PC) Cooper v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Cooper
Defendant:
Jennifer P. Shaffer, Michael Ruff, Minerva De'La and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Ruff et al
as 4:2021cv00989
Plaintiff:
Manson Graves
Defendant:
Michael Ruff, Mark Harris, Jamal Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv86942
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant v. Seusy et al
as 2:2019cv00682
Defendant:
Sherry Strub-Guess, Contractor Services 1, L.L.C., James S. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Grant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
