Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Rowe v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2020cv06175
Defendant:
County of Monroe, John Does, Monroe County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
John T Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 5:2020ct03064
Defendant:
Patterson, Judge Charles J. Siragusa, M.C.J. Lt. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Warden J. C. Holland, Dr. Gillespie Wadsworth and Counselor Mrs. Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Baker
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff, Monroe County, TN and Monroe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinton v. Livingston County
as 19-4177
Respondent:
Dr. Charles Thomas, Correctional Medical Care Inc., Livingston County Jail and others
Petitioner:
Robert L. Swinton, Jr.
Reece v. Monroe County Jail
as 4:2019cv10209
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail
Plaintiff:
Harold Glenn Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drumgoole v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2019cv06690
Defendant:
M.C. Sheriff Todd Baxter, Monroe County Exec. Cheryl Dinolfo, Prime Care Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Drumgoole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Monroe County Jail Superintendent
as 1:2019cv00619
Petitioner:
Chad S. Williams
Respondent:
Monroe County Jail Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bayon v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv01423
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
Primecare Medical, Inc., Monroe County Jail, OSHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Monroe County Jail Medical Dept.
as 6:2018cv06813
Plaintiff:
Wendyl Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv10189
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Monroe County Jail
Plaintiff:
Samuel James Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
