Cases 1 - 10 of 16
McLaughlin et al v. Onslow County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
joseph robert mclaughlin, lori ready-digiovanni and juan carlos beltran
Defendant:
onslow county board of elections, jason dedmond, michael a morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gargan v. Moser et al
as 5:2022ct03354
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Gargan
Defendant:
Vicky Moser, Kim Swindell, Donald Eppley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Jacksonville Police Department et al
as 7:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Stephanie Moser, Detective Timothy Carr, Officer Kevin Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Roland L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moser v. Dowless OBX, LLC
as 5:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Dowless OBX, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lynn Moser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Canady v. Pender County et al
as 7:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Janice Canady
Defendant:
Pender County , Pender County Health Department and Carolyn Moser
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MOSER v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 1:2012cv01258
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAY MOSER, JR.
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
MOSER v. FEALY et al
as 1:2011cv01023
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WILLIAM MOSER
Defendant:
JIM FEALY, CHAD LYNCH, TRACY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSER v. FEALY et al
as 1:2011cv00931
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WILLIAM MOSER
Defendant:
JIM FEALY, TRACY SMITH, JASON HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Bey et al v. City of Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Khadirah Ma'at T. El-Bey and Asaru Alim N.T. El-Bey
Defendant:
City of Raleigh Police Department, J.S. Varnell, David Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
