Cases 41 - 50 of 573
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Honeyfund.Com Inc, et al v. Governor, State of Florida, et al
as 22-13135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HONEYFUND.COM INC, CHEVARA ORRIN, WHITESPACE CONSULTING LLC, d.b.a. Collective Concepts LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOVERNOR, STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, SENIOR CHAIR OF THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS and others
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Moye et al
as 3:2022cv03191
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Washava Moye, specific employees of ASGDC and Richland County ("RC"), SC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Moye
as 3:2022cv02018
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Washava Moye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
HONEYFUND.COM INC et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Honeyfund.com, Inc., Chevara Orrin and Whitespace Consulting, LLC doing business as Collective Concepts, LLC
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, Darrick McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vodicka v. Ermatinger
as 22-10478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian E. Vodicka and Steven B. Aubrey
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert L. Ermatinger, Jr., Scott Robert Sayers, Does 1-20, all whose true names are unknown and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
