Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hickman v. Bell et al
as 1:2021cv04405
Plaintiff:
Mr. Shavar Hickman
Defendant:
Mr. Earl Bell
Respondent:
Letitia James and Earl Bell
Petitioner:
Shavar Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 9:2020cv82387
Plaintiff:
Mr. Earl Reed, Jr. and Rutanaporn Reed
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Chattem, Inc., Publix Super Markets, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Kelly et al
as 6:2019cv06108
Defendant:
Jane Doe/Nurse Amanda, Mr. Jackson, Wendy Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poe v. State of Maryland, et al.
as 1:2019cv01819
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Baltimore City Dentention Center and Maryland Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services
Plaintiff:
Mr. earl dwayne poe and Earl Dwayne Poe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards v. Social Security Administration
as 16-2744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mr. Earl T. Edwards, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Social Security Administration
Liu v. Lynch et al
as 1:2014cv04198
Plaintiff:
Jicheng Liu
Defendant:
James Lynch, Anita Alvarez, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: The Matter of The Tug MR. EARL, LLC
as 4:2012cv01292
Plaintiff:
The Tug MR. EARL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
GAY v. MR. EARL
as 3:2011cv01319
Plaintiff:
MAURICE GAY
Defendant:
MR. EARL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baltasaras v. Middle Brooks et al
as 1:2010cv23770
Plaintiff:
Romilus Baltasaras
Defendant:
Scott Middle Brooks, Ms. Mary, Mr. Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirby Inland Marine LP v. M/V MR. EARL, his equipment, tackle and appurtenances, etc., In Rem et al
as 4:2009cv00836
Plaintiff:
Kirby Inland Marine LP
Defendant:
M/V MR. EARL, his equipment, tackle and appurtenances, etc., In Rem, Cheryl K., Inc. and The Tug MR. EARL, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
