Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Sabatini v. Advanced Disposal Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00919
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Richard Burke, E. Renae Conley, Michael Koen and others
Krieger v. Advanced Disposal Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00904
Defendant:
Richard Burke, Tanuja M. Dehne, Michael Koen and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Krieger
CRAMER v. DUFFY et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
SGT. MROZEK and LT. DUFFY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CRAMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Karibian et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv11727
Plaintiff:
Joshua Smalls II, Joseph Paterra, Pawel Muszalski and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
WHITING et al v. COUNTY OF LAWRENCE PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv01398
Defendant:
ALLEN PORTER, JOSHUA LAMANCUSA, MICHAEL MROZEK and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WHITING and MICHELLE WHITING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00215
Defendant:
CCS NURSE, LY KOPP, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
TYRONE MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Wilson
as 18-720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dwight Smith, Laura Wnuk and Joanna Mrozek
Defendant - Appellee:
David Wilson, Rushick Chin, Ike, Derrick Chin and others
REYNOSO et al v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2017cv12356
Plaintiff:
YUDELKA REYNOSO , ROMAN WACH and JENNIFER AHMAD
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, NJ E-ZPASS, JOSEPH W. MROZEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Burrelli v. Mark Julian, et al
as 17-1567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. BURRELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK JULIAN, JOSHUA KWOLEK, MICHAEL MROZEK and others
Mrozek v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016at00721
Plaintiff:
Brad Mrozek
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
