Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Mrozek v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv01308
Plaintiff:
Brad Mrozek
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Amaya, Espinosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSA-DIAZ v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Defendant:
M. OVERMYER, D. OBERLANDER, S. SIEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mrozek v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2016cv11788
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mrozek
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 1:2016cv00918
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURRELLI v. JULIANO et al
as 2:2016cv00252
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. BURRELLI
Defendant:
MARK JULIANO , JOSHUA KWOLEK , MICHAEL MROZEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mrozek v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016at00253
Plaintiff:
Brad Mrozek
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mrozek v. California Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Brad Mrozek
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOATNER v. KING et al
as 2:2015cv01370
Plaintiff:
HARRY BOATNER, JR.
Defendant:
DALE RYAN KING, MROZEK and GOVERNMENT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Wilson et al
as 3:2015cv01215
Plaintiff:
Dwight Smith, Laura Wnuk and Joanna Mrozek
Defendant:
David Wilson, Rushick Chin and Derrick Chin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
