Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Morgan
as 7:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Norell Sterling Ward and Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Tulsa Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
Tulsa Jail, Satellite Sericer Inc., Ms Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ralls v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
Gilbert J Ralls
Defendant:
Ms. Hill and Ms. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Haywood v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Robert Jeffreys, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Pingley et al
as 7:2022cv00225
Defendant:
Mr. Marcher, Mr. Pingley, Mr. Brian Sherrell and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Hill et al
as 9:2020cv01214
Defendant:
Alyssa Moskal, Travis Hill, Ms. Ammos and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Swanigan et al
as 6:2020cv06048
Plaintiff:
Melton Lee Miller
Defendant:
Tyshique Meadows, Judge Lakeshia Swanigan, Ms. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dontez Johnson v. S. Kallis
as 20-6100
Defendant / Appellee:
MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL DIRECTOR, A. HIGGINBOTTOM, JARED RARDIN, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONTEZ JOHNSON
SNOWDEN v. DOE
as 1:2019cv00184
Respondent:
JOHN DOE
Petitioner:
STEVEN THOMAS SNOWDEN
Defendant:
JOHN I WALTON, KEITH DAY, LENA WREN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
