Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Anderson v. Eastern Diagnostic & Reception Correctional Center et al
as 4:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Eric Anderson
Defendant:
Eastern Diagnostic & Reception Correctional Center, Ms. Cook, Mr. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. L.C.A.D.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Dr. Reginald D. Bradley
Defendant:
L.C.A.D.C., Mr. Sheriff Eddie Hawkins, C.O. Mr. Lennox Bartlet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GUMBS v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv18864
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ, MS. BLACKWELL and D.K. WHITE
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN J. GUMBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Grethen v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. GRETHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, GENE M. JOHNSON, former VDOC Director, JOHN JABE, former VDOC Deputy Director and others
Bing v. McKay et al
as 2:2011cv03174
Plaintiff:
Contrez Leon Bing
Defendant:
Warden McKay, Captain Clark, Lieutenant Will and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lydia v. Cherokee County Detention Center et al
as 1:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Claude E Lydia
Defendant:
Ms Henderson, Ms Luna, Ms Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowdle v. Blanton et al
as 6:2010cv01685
Plaintiff:
John Ray Dowdle
Defendant:
Bill Blanton, Joel Hill, Dr Biance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowdle v. Chilton et al
as 1:2010cv01160
Plaintiff:
John Ray Dowdle
Defendant:
JK Chilton, W Crowe, Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowdle v. Blanton et al
as 6:2010cv00913
Plaintiff:
John Ray Dowdle
Defendant:
Bill Blanton, Joel Hill, Harold Crocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowdle v. Sheriff Bill Blanton et al
as 6:2010cv00821
Plaintiff:
John Ray Dowdle
Defendant:
Bill Blanton, Joel Hill, Kenny Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
