Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mahon v. Burrows et al
as 1:2026cv02547
Plaintiff:
Zachary M. Mahon
Defendant:
MD Maureen S. Burrows, Dr. Bhatti Farrukh and Austin State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv02054
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mahon v. Five-Two Apartments et al
as 1:2026cv02389
Plaintiff:
Zachary M. Mahon
Defendant:
Five-Two Apartments, Female Doctor/UT-Seton Hospital/Downtown/Blue Eyes, Male Doctor/UT-Seton Hospital/Downtown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Robinson et al
as 4:2026cv07143
Plaintiff:
Gregory Demon Cunningham
Defendant:
Nancy Robinson, Michael Porter, November Mahone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Zaino v. Brady Mahone
as 26-12919
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN ZAINO
Defendant:
BRADY JAMES MAHONE
Aguilar v. Tafelmeyer, et al.
as 26-5326
Plaintiff:
DAVID AGUILAR
Defendant:
JEREMY TAFELMEYER, JOSEPH JOHNSON, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mahoning, Trumbull and Shenango Valley Central Administrative Agency, by its Board of Trustees v. George Babyak Painting, Inc.
as 4:2026cv01927
Plaintiff:
Mahoning, Trumbull and Shenango Valley Central Administrative Agency
Defendant:
George Babyak Painting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Zaino v. Mahone
as 1:2026cv04400
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Zaino
Defendant:
Brady James Mahone
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01803
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
