Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Price v. Haddix et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Arttie Price
Defendant:
Rachel Haddix, Nurse Medical Department, Officer Mail Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Gautreaux et al
as 3:2023cv01541
Plaintiff:
Andre Thomas
Defendant:
Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Roderick Brown, Dennis Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Mail Department
as 3:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Robert C Rogers
Defendant:
Mail Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Community Correction et al
as 5:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dewayne Gordon and Kievin Dewayne Gordon
Defendant:
Community Correction, Mailing Department and (IBarra)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. Mark Morgan, et al
as 22-3045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK MORGAN, Medical Doctor, USP Thomson, THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Vasco v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Vasco
Defendant:
Ms. Young, Ms. Brown, Mr. Martin and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROUGHTON v. FORT DIX MAIL DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN S. BROUGHTON
Defendant:
FORT DIX MAIL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Will Sitton v. LVMPD, et al
as 21-17084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILL SITTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF LAMBARDO, LAS VEGAS REVIEW JOURNAL and others
Medellin v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Frances Medellin
Defendant:
NFN Gonzales, Warden NFN Carr, NFN Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velez v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00518
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, (FBOP), Warden M. Carr, Ms. FNU Dinkins and others
Plaintiff:
Connie C. Valez and Connie Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
