Cases 61 - 70 of 169
Roudabush v. Hollembaek et al
as 5:2018ct03104
Plaintiff:
James L. Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
S. Hollembaek, S. Butler, Lt. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Suber v. Snohomish County Corrections Mailroom Staff et al
as 2:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
James Suber
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Moyer et al
as 1:2018cv00363
Plaintiff:
Scotland Williams
Defendant:
Stephen Moyer, Dayena Corcoran, Frank Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Scott et al
as 3:2017cv01454
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper
Defendant:
Rick Scott and Mailroom Staff Employees RMC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royal v. Scott et al
as 3:2017cv01453
Plaintiff:
Marcus Royal
Defendant:
Gov. Rick Scott, Julie Jones and Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. CSP-Corcoran Mailroom Staff, et al.
as 1:2017cv01331
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lonnell Roberson
Defendant:
CSP-Corcoran Mailroom Staff and Zavala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Kokinda v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 17-3166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C/0 PEGRAM, official/personal capacity), SHELLY MANKEY, (official/personal capacity) and others
Talley v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv06341
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Wexford's Medical Director, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tart v. John Does et al
as 5:2017ct03207
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Antwan Tart
Defendant:
John Does and Tabor City Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kader v. Deparatment of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv04106
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Kader
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Susan Johannsen, Robert Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
