Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,130
Major v. McVege et al
as 4:2024cv02629
Plaintiff: Matthew B. Major
Defendant: McVege, Bravo, Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAJOR v. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff: JOHN R MAJOR
Defendant: PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI GREENE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant: DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: Deandrae Deas
Defendant: Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardenas v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00443
Petitioner: Isaac Cardenas
Respondent: Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff: KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Goldsboro v. Ivey et al
as 6:2024cv00810
Plaintiff: Harry Lee Goldsboro, II
Defendant: Wayne Ivey, Major Torquado, Jennifer Leca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. Mailroom Supervisor JB et al
as 7:2024cv00284
Plaintiff: Jeremy DeFour
Defendant: Mailroom Supervisor JB, Warden Rick White and Major J. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00282
Plaintiff: Micah Smith
Defendant: Director Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Major Jeremy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farner v. Redmond et al
as 3:2024cv50159
Plaintiff: Joshua Farner
Defendant: Robert Redmond, Justin Egler, Major Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?