Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Muhammad v. Kaloroumakis et al
as 1:2014cv01794
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
George Kaloroumakis, Christina Tyler-Cauffman, Thomas V. Kimball, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. May et al
as 5:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
Larry May, Gaylon Lay and Mark Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. May et al
as 5:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
Larry May, Aundrea Weekly, John Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv01636
Plaintiff:
Malik Muhammad Ali
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, James M LeBlanc, Linda Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Conway
as 10-3118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
Mr. Conway, Attica Superintendent
Defendant - Appellee:
Correctional Sergeant Lowe, Correctional Officer G. Pritchard, Correctional Officer Schuessler and others
Muhammads v. Hodge
as 10-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Malik Muhammads
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott Hodge and Angela Bartlett
Muhammad v. Conway
as 10-1302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
Mr. Conway, Attica Superintendent
Defendant - Appellee:
Correctional Sergeant Lowe, Correctional Officer G. Pritchard, Correctional Officer Schuessler and others
Muhammad v. New York Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01707
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
New York Department of Corrections, N.Y.C. Department of Health and Hospital Services, Jean Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Hartley
as 1:2010cv00094
Petitioner:
Abdul Malik Muhammad
Respondent:
James D. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Conway et al
as 1:2008cv00658
Plaintiff:
Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
. Conway, Correctional Sergeant Lowe, G. Pritchard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
