Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Fearless Fund Management, LLC, et al
as 23-13138
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR EQUAL RIGHTS
Defendant / Appellee: FEARLESS FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC, FEARLESS FUND II, GP, LLC, FEARLESS FUND II, LP and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE and AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Amicus Curiae: THE EQUAL PROTECTION PROJECT, AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS PROJECT, MANHATTAN INSTITUTE and others
L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant: L. M., a minor by and through his father and stepmother and natural guardians, Christopher and Susan Morrison
Defendant / Appellee: MIDDLEBOROUGH, MA, MIDDLEBOROUGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, CAROLYN J. LYONS, Superintendent, Middleborough Public Schools, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: INSTITUTE FOR FAITH AND FAMILY, PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS
Smith v. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv06143
Plaintiff: Oliver D. Smith
Defendant: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
National Horsemen's Benevolent v. Black
as 23-10520
Plaintiff / Appellant: National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association, Arizona Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association, Arkansas Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Texas and Texas Racing Commission
Defendant / Appellee: Jerry Black, Katrina Adams, Leonard Coleman and others
Amicus Curiae: North American Association of Racetrack Veterinarians, American Quarter Horse Association, Reason Foundation and others
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant: Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee: Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant: Martha Doenning
Appellant: Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and others
Speech First v. Shrum
as 23-6054
Plaintiff / Appellant: SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: KAYSE SHRUM, in her official capacity as President of Oklahoma State University
Petitioner: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
Moms for Liberty - Brevard County, FL, et al v. Brevard Public Schools, et al
as 23-10656
Plaintiff / Appellant: MOMS FOR LIBERTY - BREVARD COUNTY, FL, AMY KNEESSY, ASHLEY HALL and others
Defendant / Appellee: BREVARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MISTY HAGGARD-BELFORD, MATT SUSIN and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF ALASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Not Classified By Court: SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, ADVANCING AMERICAN FREEDOM, INC., AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE and others
Boe et al v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff: Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Amicus Curiae: State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner: Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harbus v. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv06124
Plaintiff: Richard Harbus
Defendant: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Martinka v. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02671
Plaintiff: Paul Martinka
Defendant: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?