Cases 1 - 10 of 22
CARRILLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21256
Plaintiff:
MANUEL CARRILLO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARRILLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08427
Plaintiff:
MANUEL CARRILLO, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CARRILLO-TREMILLO v. USA
as 1:2022cv00561
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL CARRILLO-TREMILLO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Negron v. Carrillo et al
as 4:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
Stephan Negron
Defendant:
Victor Manuel Carrillo, USA Auto Incorporated, Red Mountain Funding Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710
Sandoval v. Martinez et al
as 5:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Checos Refrigerados S DE RL DE CV and Jose Manuel Carrillo Martinez
Plaintiff:
Hilse Yvette Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo v. Nerheim et al
as 1:2019cv05454
Defendant:
Michael G. Nerheim, Lake County and Roderick Drobinski
Plaintiff:
Manuel Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgar Carrillo-Ramos, et al v. William Barr
as 19-71289
Petitioner:
NEMIAS CARRILLO-VELAZQUEZ, EDGAR MANUEL CARRILLO-RAMOS and MALDILLA VELAZQUEZ-CARRILLO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Carrillo v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Carrillo
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Victor Carrillo-Carrillo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70891
Petitioner:
VICTOR CARRILLO-CARRILLO, AKA Victor Manuel Carrillo-Carrillo
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
