Cases 21 - 30 of 3,574
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
John Jackson
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pendelton v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pendelton
Defendant:
Johnson, Tulf, Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
John Jackson
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Partaka v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dennis W Partaka
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv22804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
North End Chamber of Commerce, Inc. et al v. City of Boston
as 1:2024cv10039
Plaintiff:
North End Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 119 Salem St., Inc. doing business as Ristorante Euno, Antico Forno, Inc. doing business as Antico Forno and others
Defendant:
City of Boston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mares v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06666
Plaintiff:
Peter Anthony Mares
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moza-Guerrero v. Garland
as 24-38
Petitioner:
CESAR MOZA-GUERRERO, KARLA ALAS-CASTRO and KIMBERLY MARELY MOZA-ALAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
