Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Contreras v. QT South LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Maria Contreras
Defendant:
QT South LLC and QuickTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Contreras v. Zale Delaware, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
Maria Contreras
Defendant:
Zale Delaware, Inc. d/b/a Signet Jewelers, Zale Corporation and Zale Delaware, Inc. doing business as Signet Jewelers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Contreras et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv06601
Plaintiff:
MARIA CONTRERAS and ANTONIO CONTRERAS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03004
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
DeMuth v. McMahon
as 19-1634
Defendant / Appellee:
Linda McMahon, in her official capacity as Administrator of Small Business Administration and United States Small Business Administration
Defendant:
Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sandra DeMuth
Contreras et al v. City of Corpus Christi
as 2:2019cv00133
Plaintiff:
Maria Contreras and Jose A. Contreras
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv11362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Contreras et al v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Company Case remanded to County Civil Court No 1, Harris County
as 4:2019cv01161
Plaintiff:
Maria Contreras and Jose Contreras
Defendant:
United Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Arceo et al v. US Xpress Inc
as 4:2017cv05192
Plaintiff:
Pedro Arceo and Maria Contreras-Arceo
Defendant:
US Xpress Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2724
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
