Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marquez v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv25638
Plaintiff:
Maria Marquez
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mimiele Goulatte, et al v. County of Riverside, et al
as 12-57022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIMIELE GOULATTE, BONNIE RHEA-SCOTT, SOAR, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Erroneously Sued As Riverside County Public Housing Authority, JERRY WENGERD, an individual and others
Zhi Ming Guo et al v. Ana Maria Marquez et al
as 2:2012cv09171
Defendant:
Does and Ana Maria Marquez
Plaintiff:
Zhi Ming Guo and Paul Lin
Maria Marquez-Piceno et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2011cv06382
Defendant:
Does, ETS Services LLC, Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Marquez-Piceno and Victor Piceno
AREVALO et al v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2011cv02339
Plaintiff:
NUVIA AREVALO , RAUL GONZALEZ , RUBEN GUEVARA and others
Defendant:
UMHP PROPERTIES INC, UMH SALES AND FINANCE and GAIL WHITTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mimiele Goulatte et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2011cv01740
Defendant:
Lynne Brockmeier, County of Riverside, Donna Dahl and others
Plaintiff:
Mimiele Goulatte and Bonnie Rhea-Scott
ROBINSON v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv01045
Plaintiff:
ANGELIQUE ROBINSON
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, MARIA MARQUEZ and LAURIE LYNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Burlington Insurance Company, The v. Panacorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00587
Plaintiff:
Burlington Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
Panacorp, Inc., Macario C. Panajon, David Kahookele and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
