Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Romano v. Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10475
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ROMANO, as Proposed Administrator of the Estate of MARY ROMANO, Deceased and Benjamin Romano
Defendant:
Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 mm Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROMANO v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02627
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARIE ROMANO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Romano v. Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Inc.
as 1:2018cv11706
Defendant:
Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marie Romano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Romano v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04608
Plaintiff:
Marie Romano
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kraft et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv01517
Plaintiff:
Rose Kraft , Sandra Huss , Kim Hampton and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kraft et al v. Ethicon Inc
as TXN/3:14-cv-03467
Plaintiff:
Rose Kraft , Sandra Huss , Kim Hampton and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Kraft et al v. Ethicon Inc
as 3:2014cv03467
Plaintiff:
Rose Kraft , Sandra Huss , Kim Hampton and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROMANO v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2013cv06868
Plaintiff:
JOAN MARIE ROMANO
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Romano v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00252
Plaintiff:
Billie Marie Romano
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
