Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Brooks v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv02178
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Brooks
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robbie Thomas v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-1375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBBIE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, MARILYN BROOKS, NANCY A. GIROUX and others
WILLIAMS v. THE STATE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2010cv00019
Defendant:
THE STATE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, JEFFREY BEARD, MARILYN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MINCY v. MCCONNELL et al
as 1:2009cv00236
Plaintiff:
HILTON KARRIEM MINCY
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MCCONNELL, K. SUTTER, B. SCHAEF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STONER v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE AT ALBION et al
as 1:2009cv00230
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. STONER, JR.
Defendant:
STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE AT ALBION, MARILYN BROOKS, MELINDA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
In re: Glen Williams, et al
as 09-3513
Petitioner:
In re: GLEN A. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MARILYN BROOKS, DA ERIE CTY and ATTY GEN PA
HAWKINS v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE HAWKINS
Defendant:
MARILYN BROOKS, RHODA WINSTEAD, ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Romeo Cooley v. Marilyn Brooks, et al
as 09-2241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROMEO COOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARILYN BROOKS, DA ERIE CTY, ATTY GEN PA and others
Aaron Sloan v. Marilyn Brooks, et al
as 09-2180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARILYN BROOKS, Ex-Superintendent, WILLIAM COLE, Ex-Disiplinary Hearing Examiner, TIMOTHY MARK, Deputy Chief Council for Hearings and Appeals and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
