Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hamilton v. Promise Healthcare
as 23-30190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marilyn Hamilton
Defendant / Appellee:
Promise Healthcare
Timothy Leuenhagen et al v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv01187
Defendant:
Carnival PLC, Carnival Corporation and Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.
Plaintiff:
James Lemaire, Nancy Leuenhagen, Edward Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON et al v. THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv05396
Defendant:
PRERNA SRIVASTAVA, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, BRIDGET DONNELLY and others
Plaintiff:
S.R. and MARILYN HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Peurach, et al
as 3:2018cv03466
Defendant:
Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc., Jack Peurach, Russ Angold and others
Plaintiff:
Dimitrula Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rouse v. Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01348
Defendant:
Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. , Steven Sherman , Thomas Looby and others
Plaintiff:
Ward Rouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Promise Healthcare
as 3:2018cv00102
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Hamilton
Defendant:
Promise Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hamilton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04360
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Hamilton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
K. v. Spacapan et al
as 1:2017cv04703
Plaintiff:
Kelly K.
Defendant:
Lise Spacapan, Marilyn Hamilton, Thayer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
