Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Ramon Mario Miranda
as 5:2022cv01633
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Ramon Mario Miranda individually doing business as Dorrys Bar and Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
USA v. Madrid-Paz
as 22-20397
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Salomon Madrid-Paz, also known as Mario Miranda, also known as Emio Torres Gomez, also known as Miguel Mateo Flores, also known as Jorge Mendarez Paz, also known as Juan Dedios Gutierrez, also known as Chaparro, also known as Viejo
MIRANDA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26347
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARIO MIRANDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mario Miranda Castro v. William Barr
as 19-72279
Petitioner:
MARIO MIRANDA CASTRO, AKA Luis Hernandez Miranda
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Ansu v. Core Civic et al
as 2:2018cv03851
Defendant:
Unknown Gonzales, Enrique Lucero, Unknown Kirby and others
Plaintiff:
Taplima Ansu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miranda v. The City of Sweetwater
as 1:2015cv23871
Plaintiff:
Mario Miranda
Defendant:
The City of Sweetwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pena v. Greek Kitchen Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03831
Plaintiff:
Mario Miranda Pena
Defendant:
Greek Kitchen Inc. and Theodosios Andriotis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
USA v. Mario Garcia
as 10-36159
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIO MIRANDA GARCIA
Mario Miranda Madrigal v. Leland McEwen
as 2:2010cv03552
Petitioner:
Mario Miranda Madrigal
Respondent:
Leland McEwen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
