Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Trejo-Chavez v. USA (DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:21-cr-10013-JWB-2)
as 6:2023cv01065
Petitioner:
Mario Trejo-Chavez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trejo v. CCDC et al
as 2:2019cv00342
Defendant:
Dr Weiner, CCDC, Naphcare admin and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Trejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trejo v. K.A.M. Food Store, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03320
Defendant:
Kareem Dolah, Mahmoud Hassan Dolah and K.A.M. Food Store, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mario Trejo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Mario Trejo-Rubio
as 16-50099
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIO TREJO-RUBIO, also known as Mario Trejo
Lopez et al v. Marfi Contracting Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv05118
Defendant:
Anastasios Fikias, Helen Fikias and Marfi Contracting Corp.
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lopez and Mario Trejo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv01179
Plaintiff:
Mario Trejo Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeh Johnson, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart
as 3:2014cv00922
Plaintiff:
Clete Reo Hart
Defendant:
Keisha Felix, Zakita Johnson and Mario Trejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J and J Sports Productions Inc v. Mario Trejo
as 2:2012cv09657
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Mario Trejo
Trejo et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
Joel Trejo , Alondra Trejo , Dania Trejo and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , Robert Collins and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
