Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 190
Tanzer v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv04044
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAHAN v. INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE GROUP INC., ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03161
Defendant: DONALD E. BROWN, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff: KARL TRAHAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
FISCHER v. INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02666
Defendant: DONALD E. BROWN, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, EDWARD L. HAMBURG and others
Plaintiff: SCOTT FISCHER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Hill v. Angeles, et al
as 16-1919
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK V. HILL
Defendant - Appellee: MARIA L. ANGELES, LINDA BOOTH, THOMAS A. GROBLEWSKI, Program Medical Director and others
Defendant: UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
Hill v. USA
as 4:2016cv00075
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Mark D Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. Angeles, et al
as 16-1664
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK V. HILL
Defendant - Appellee: DR. MARIA L. ANGELES, LINDA BOOTH and THOMAS A. GROBLEWSKI
Defendant: UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, DYANA NICKL, Grievance & Appeals Coordinator, PETER J. HEFFERNAN, Deputy Director Health Services Division and others
In re: Mark Hill
as 16-5507
Movant: In re: MARK D. HILL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark A Hill v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01439
Plaintiff: Mark A Hill
Defendant: Volkswagen Group of America Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mark A Hill v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01575
Defendant: Does and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mark A Hill
Mark A Hill v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00443
Defendant: Does and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mark A Hill

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?