Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cooper v. Prince et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bruce X. Cooper
Defendant:
Scott Prince and Mark Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cramer v. Prince et al
as 1:2023cv01988
Plaintiff:
William Cramer
Defendant:
Scott Prince and Mark Abel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Abel et al
as 1:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
Michael Sherman Allen
Defendant:
Mark Abel, Wellpath, Kevin Ransom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawkins v. Abel et al
as 2:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Bruce E. Dawkins
Defendant:
Mark Abel and Ed. Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Croce v. Lisiak et al
as 1:2021cv01965
Plaintiff:
Richard Della Croce
Defendant:
John Lisiak, Ronald Siejack, Martin Loscalzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grossman v. Allied Resources LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01190
Defendant:
Mark Abell, Allied Resources LLC and John R. Kennedy
Plaintiff:
Karen Grossman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 Maximum Hours
Patrice Karst et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
Mark Abel and Patrice Karst
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Does, Duvall and others
ELLISON v. HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv00331
Plaintiff:
CHERYL A. ELLISON
Defendant:
HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM, THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Woods v. Green et al
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A Woods
Defendant:
Leonard Green, Judge Clay, Judge McKeague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Marbley et al
as 2:2007cv01192
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A Woods
Defendant:
Algenon Marbley, Mark Abel, Scott Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
