Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Arizona, State of v. Meadows
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of
Defendant:
Mark Meadows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Speigner et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Terry Miller, John L Miceli, Chinua McGee and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Speigner et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
John L Miceli, Phil Martin, Wayne McPhail and others
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
MARK MEADOWS v. COLLEEN SHOGAN et al
as 1:2024cv01856
Defendant:
COLLEEN SHOGAN and JACK SMITH
Plaintiff:
MARK MEADOWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Robert Johnson v. Donald Trump, et al
as 23-3581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Robert Johnson v. Donald Trump, et al
as 23-1953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, FACEBOOK, INC., META and others
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 2:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Trump, et al
as 23-1783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, FACEBOOK, INC., META and others
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robert Johnson v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 23-3122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert J. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
