Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dewayne Davidson v. Mark Pierson, et al
as 21-2069
Defendant / Appellee: Tommy Smith, Doe, President for investigation into the criminal activity of the Army Reserves, Mark Pierson, Sgt. Major for the Army Reserves and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dewayne Davidson
Davidson v. Pierson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00302
Defendant: Tommy Smith, Doe, Trent Pierson and others
Plaintiff: Dewayne Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGahee et al v. National Tire & Battery et al
as 3:2019cv02289
Plaintiff: Mark Pierson and Scott McGahee
Defendant: TBC Corporation and National Tire & Battery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davidson v. Pierson et al
as 4:2017cv00103
Plaintiff: Dewayne Davidson
Defendant: Mark Pierson and U.S. Army Reserves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davidson v. Pierson et al
as 4:2016cv01181
Plaintiff: Dewayne L Davidson
Defendant: Mark Pierson and U.S. Army Reserves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv04775
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Davidson v. Barak et al
as 4:2016cv00819
Plaintiff: Dewayne L Davidson
Defendant: Obama Barak, Chuck Hagal, Tammy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2846
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00424
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Rever v. Pierson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01265
Petitioner: Scott J Rever
Respondent: Mark Pierson and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?