Cases 1 - 10 of 71
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAETZ v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv21026
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS, JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI, JUDGE KEVIN MCNULTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Frederick BanksIn re: Frederick Banks
as 23-2022
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MARK R. HORNAK
Matthew DecIn re: Matthew Dec
as 23-1244
Petitioner:
In re: MATTHEW P. DEC
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA Attorney General, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PA Chief Counsel Office, PennDOT, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2022cv02399
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, MERICK B GARLAND, CHIEF JUDGE MICHAEL A CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
William RichardsonIn re: William Richardson
as 21-2591
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM RICHARDSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MARK R. HORNAK
FILBERT v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2020cv01858
Defendant:
LINDA COHEN, JOY FLOWERS CONTI, MARGRET PICKENS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. FILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Frederick Banks
as 20-2571
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MARK R HORNAK
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK H. BANKS
William RichardsonIn re: William Richardson
as 20-2312
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM RICHARDSON
Respondent:
MARK R HORNAK and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
