Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Simmons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04049
Plaintiff:
Mark Simmons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons (ID 86544) v. Smith et al
as 5:2020cv03065
Plaintiff:
Victor Mark Simmons
Defendant:
Danny Smith, Kansas, State of, Crawford County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Crawford County Jail et al
as 5:2019cv03193
Plaintiff:
Victor Mark Simmons
Defendant:
Danny Smith, Dan Peak, Valerio Bevilacqua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. AAA Apartment Staffing, LTD
as 4:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mark Simmons
Defendant:
AAA Apartment Staffing, LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Glenn Myer v. Bruce White
as 18-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN MYER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE DOUGLAS WHITE, BRETT A. KASSABIAN, GRACE BURKE CARROLL and others
Defendant:
MARK SIMMONS, LISA MAYNE, JANE DOES, at the District Court Protective Order department and others
Simmons v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04941
Plaintiff:
Mark Simmons
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv02459
Plaintiff:
Mark Simmons
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Assistant Deputy Warden of G.R.V.C., Deputy of Security of G.R.V.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
