Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Counter Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., Rockwell International Corporation and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, United States Department of the Air Force, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Colonial Pipeline Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, United States Navy and others
Plaintiff:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Appellant:
Revere Copper Products, Inc., AKA Revere Copper & Brass Incorporated
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant:
EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant:
Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
United States of America v. Harrington and Richardson, Model 58, .410 caliber shotgun, serial number AM315814 et al
as 9:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Harrington and Richardson, Model 58, .410 caliber shotgun, serial number AM315814, Hopkins and Allen, 12 gauge shotgun with no serial number, Marlin Firearms Company, Model 336RC, 30-30 caliber rifle, serialnumber AB44421 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Izmash Saiga-12 Shotgun Cal 12, Serial No. HQ8402196 et al
as 3:2013cv00309
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Izmash Saiga-12 Shotgun Cal 12, Serial No. HQ8402196, Remington Arms Company Nylon 66.22 Rifle Cal 2, Serial No. XL34, Romarm Cugir PSL Rifle Cal 762, Serial No. R974409RO and others
Claimant:
Jay Wittlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
USA v. Izmash Saiga-12 Shotgun Cal 12, Serial No. HQ8402196 et al
as 3:2013mc00011
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Izmash Saiga-12 Shotgun Cal 12, Serial No. HQ8402196, Remington Arms Company Nylon 66.22 Rifle Cal 2, Serial No. XL34, Romarm Cugir PSL Rifle Cal 762, Serial No. R974409RO and others
Claimant:
Jay Wittlin
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Ryan and Andrus Personal Property et al
as 4:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Ryan and Andrus Personal Property, A Handgun, Manufacturer: Ruger, A Shotgun, Manufacturer: Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924 Forfeiture Property - Firearm
United States of America v. Ruger 10/11 Rifle, .22 Caliber, Serial Number 114-78555 et al
as 4:2012cv01471
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ruger 10/11 Rifle, .22 Caliber, Serial Number 114-78555, Polytechnologies M14 Rifle, .308 Caliber, Serial Number 06268, High Standard 200 Shotgun, 12 guage, no serial number and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Claudio Personal Property, et al
as 4:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Claudio Personal Property, A Winchester Shotgun, A Harrington and Richardson Shotgun and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924
USA v. One Remington Arms Company Inc., Model 7400 Rifle .270 Win Caliber, bearing Serial Number 8556430 et al
as 3:2011cv00708
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
One Remington Arms Company Inc., Model 7400 Rifle .270 Win Caliber, Bearing Serial Number 8556430, One Marlin Firearms Company, Model 25MN Rifle, .22 W.M.R. Caliber, Bearing Serial Number 06496972, One Savage Arms Company, Model 110 Bolt Action Rifle, 7 MM Rem Mag Caliber, Bearing Serial Number F536840 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Reddoch v. The Marlin Firearms Company
as 4:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Reddoch
Defendant:
The Marlin Firearms Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
