Cases 1 - 10 of 790
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01749
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Marquis Taylor
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Evans v. Lornetta Smith, et al
as 24-1882
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Evans
Defendant:
Lornetta Smith, Sergeant, Varner Unit, ADC, Telicia Mothershed and Marquis Taylor, Corporal, Verner Unit, ADC (Originally named as "M Taylor")
Tisdale v. USA
as 6:2024cv06256
Petitioner:
Marquis Tisdale
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jefferies v. Vantell
as 3:2024cv00456
Petitioner:
Joseph Marquis Jefferies
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown El Bey v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
Marquis Brown El Bey
Respondent:
Warden Brian Emig, The Attorney General of the State of Delaware and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Polanco et al
as 1:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
Marquis Phillips
Defendant:
Edwin Polanco and John Doe ADS L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Marenzo Marquis Roberts
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee' Tate
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquis Thompson v. Sheyde Perry, et al
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS THOMPSON
Defendant:
SHEYDE PERRY, TERRY COLLINS and DANIELLE MERRIFIELD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
