Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Doe v. Nash County Board of Education et al
as 5:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Nash County Board of Education, Daniel Colvin, Steven Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Marquis Johnson
as 23-4461
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUIS JOHNSON, a/k/a Marques, a/k/a Marty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Johnson et al v. City and County Honolulu
as 1:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Marquis Johnson
Defendant:
City and County Honolulu, Jacob D. Mecham, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Parker
as 4:2021cv00384
Petitioner:
Marquis Johnson
Respondent:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Davis
as 4:2020cv00760
Petitioner:
Roderick Marquis Johnson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson et al v. Hudson et al
as 3:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tasha Hudson, Mark Johnson and Marquis Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe and Jon Freivald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W.X., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, T.X. v. JOHN WITHERSPOON MIDDLE SCHOOL et al
as 3:2017cv06099
Plaintiff:
W.X.
Defendant:
JOHN WITHERSPOON MIDDLE SCHOOL , PRINCETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS , JASON BURR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GAITER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 0:2016cv62755
Plaintiff:
Tony Gaiter , Sedrick Irvin , KEVIN HARRIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOTBALL CLUB, LLC, MIAMI DOLPHINS, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2016cv01446
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Marquis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
