Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Ashlock v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Marrio Drantrell Ashlock
Defendant:
Amarshay Johnson, Ahtreyonna Holloman and Ty-Quann Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murrell v. City of Oak Creek et al
as 2:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Marrio Murrell
Defendant:
City of Oak Creek, City of Oak Creek Police Department, David Stecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00544
Petitioner:
MARRIO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faceson v. Flat Branch Mortgage et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Marrio Authony Faceson
Defendant:
Flat Branch Mortgage and Sarah Craig
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lau et al v. Fauci et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Defendant:
The Estate of William Henry Gates III, JOHN DOE, Dr. Anthony Stephen Fauci and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lau, Joseph Barton and Jose Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Leandra Chisholm, Jr.
as 21-3271
Defendant / Appellant:
LEANDRA MARRIO CHISHOLM, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COWAN v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00205
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
MARRIO COWAN
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42553
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARRIO DIONNIE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Verlin v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01962
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Marrio Hotel Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Verlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. State of Georgia
as 1:2019mi00196
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Marrio Terrell Moore Bey
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
