Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Ferguson v. KAG Leasing, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv00031
Plaintiff:
Martin Allen Ferguson
Defendant:
Michael Rupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allen v. Tractor Supply Co., Inc.
as 1:2025cv00535
Plaintiff:
Martin Allen
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson v. State of Oregon
as 2:2025cv01096
Petitioner:
Martin Allen Johnson
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2025sf65789
Plaintiff:
Martin Allen
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Pendleton
as 25-1790
Petitioner:
MARTIN ALLEN JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PENDLETON
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF OREGON
Thomas v. Perry et al
as 3:2025cv00054
Plaintiff:
Donna F. Thomas
Defendant:
Martin Allen Perry, Western Flyer Express, LLC, John Doe Person(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
MARTIN-ALLEN v. CURLETT et al
as 2:2022cv01181
Plaintiff:
TAYVON MARTIN-ALLEN
Defendant:
KATELYNN MADDISON CURLETT, HABIL SIMON OMAMO and ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MARTIN-ALLEN v. CURLETT et al
as 2:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
TAYVON MARTIN-ALLEN
Defendant:
KATELYNN MADDISON CURLETT, HABIL SIMON OMAMO and ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
USA v. Martin Mentzer
as 22-1171
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARTIN ALLEN MENTZER
USA v. Martin Mentzer
as 20-3279
Defendant / Appellant:
MARTIN ALLEN MENTZER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
