Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Scott et al v. Clorox Company, The
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Martin Scott and Cindi Scott
Defendant:
Clorox Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jett v. Powell
as 7:2023cv01674
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Jett, Jr., Tara S. Jett, I.R.J. and others
Defendant:
The Country Acres Association of Columbus County Ltd., George Parker Coleman, Michael P. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. USA
as 2:2023cv03757
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Scott, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SCOTT v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv17216
Plaintiff:
MARTIN SCOTT
Defendant:
ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., A-S Medication Solutions, LLC, H J HARKINS CO., INC. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROEMERMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17199
Plaintiff:
MARTIN SCOTT ROEMERMAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Lowe Law Group et al
as 8:2018cv02484
Defendant:
Consumer Attorney Marketing Group and Lowe Law Group
Plaintiff:
Martin Scott
Undetermined:
Peter J. Grilli
USA v. Martin Wolfe
as 17-1553
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN SCOTT WOLFE
USA v. Martin Wolfe
as 17-1552
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN SCOTT WOLFE
USA v. Martin Wolfe
as 17-1551
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN SCOTT WOLFE
Jackson v. Klein, Thorpe and Jenkins, Ltd. et al
as 1:2016cv10499
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jackson
Defendant:
Klein, Thorpe and Jenkins, Ltd. , Michael T. Jurusik , Patrick R. Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
