Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Nunn v. Satrom et al
as 2:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Barbra Gayle Nunn
Defendant:
John Satrom, Scott Stinar , Mary Hertsgaard and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MARTZ v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv05383
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. MARTZ, JR.
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and BENEFICIAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In Re: Edward Martz, Esq.
as 1:2011mc00494
Respondent:
Edward Martz
Cause Of Action: Disciplinary Proceedings
Martz v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2010cv00590
Plaintiff:
Donald Martz
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Pilarowski etal., v Wise etal.,
as 4:2010cv11170
Plaintiff:
Lisa Pilarowski , Zachary Pilarowski , Rachel Pilarowski and others
Defendant:
Susan Wise, Daniel Wise, James Wise and others
Asset Funding Group, L.L.C. v. Adams and Reese, L.L.P.
as 2:2009mc00052
Plaintiff:
Asset Funding Group, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Adams and Reese, L.L.P.
Movant:
Gary R Martz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
David Martz v. FAA, et al
as 09-1194
Petitioner:
David Keith Martz
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration and Lynne A. Osmus, Acting Administrator, FAA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MARTZ v. CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2007cv00361
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. MARTZ, PAUL A. MARTZ and PAUL A. MARTZ
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
