Cases 41 - 50 of 292
HAYES et al v. ALBERSON et al
as 1:2021cv02782
Plaintiff:
QUINTERO HAYES
Defendant:
ALBERSON, BRIAN MARTZ, OPIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. DAVIS CARPER et al
as 1:2021cv02750
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA DAVIS CARPER, JODIE MURPHY, BRITTNEY GROVES-MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37395
Plaintiff:
JENNI MARTZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33431
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN STONEY MARTZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Sadler v. Jim Salmonsen, et al
as 21-35594
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY RAY SADLER
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM SALMONSEN, GREG GIANFORTE, KOOTKIN and others
Jones v. Nowlin et al
as 1:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
Ra'Quan Jones
Defendant:
Austin Nowlin and William Martz, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Martz Coach Company et al v. Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00795
Plaintiff:
Frank Martz Coach Company, Gold Line, Inc., Gold Line Inc. of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
MARTZ v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2021cv02750
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTZ, SR.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MARTZ v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ("AMTRAK")
as 2:2021cv02749
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ("AMTRAK")
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTZ, SR.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MARTZ v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2021cv02750
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTZ, SR.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
