Cases 1 - 10 of 15
WALKER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00487
Petitioner:
MARVIN WALKER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
WALKER v. MASCIELLINO et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
MARVIN WALKER
Defendant:
CAPT. DAVID MASCIELLINO, SGT. HALL, TOMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LUCKIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32764
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARVIN WALKER LUCKIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Jackson County Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00838
Defendant:
Marvin Walker, Jackson County Missouri, Carmen Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ingham et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01857
Defendant:
Imerys Talc America, Inc., Luzenac America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Compaines, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Beagle Webster, Monica Sherise Sweat, Marvin Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fambrough v. Barrow County et al
as 2:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
Tittoris Tavarus Fambrough
Defendant:
Marvin Walker, Barrow County and Unknown Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Walker et al v. Brantley
as 1:2016cv01910
Plaintiff:
Gloria M. Walker and Marvin Walker
Defendant:
Grant Brantley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin Lovette v. Brian Gage, et al
as 15-1563
Petitioner - Appellant:
Marvin Walker Lovette
Respondent - Appellee:
Brian Gage, Warden, Tecumseh State Corr. Inst. and Michael Kenney
Lovette v. Houston et al
as 4:2014cv03056
Respondent:
Brian Gage and Robert P. Houston
Petitioner:
Marvin Walker Lovette
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
