Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Murphy v. Carnival Corporation, et al
as 1:2019cv21450
Defendant:
Dr. Chenna Kesava Reddy Yenuga Mandi, Kathy Mzelemu, Doctor Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11144
Plaintiff:
Joseph Quinones, Dennis Dawid, Gary Luciani and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Murphy et al v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv08982
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Murphy and Tony Murphy, Sr.
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. WESTWOOD REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2015cv06053
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN MURPHY
Defendant:
WESTWOOD REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cross_claimant:
WESTWOOD REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Adrian Moon v. Douglas F. McCormick et al
as 2:2014cv09781
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Audrey B. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Moon
Murphy et al v. Commonwealth Asset Service, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
Jim Murphy and Mary Ann Murphy
Defendant:
Commonwealth Asset Service, LLC, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , Litton Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adrian Moon v. Michael Johnson et al
as 5:2012cv00632
Defendant:
Lauren E Dana, Anthony McFarland, Aaron Jenson and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian D Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURPHY v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv71319
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN MURPHY
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
