Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Anthony v. Cobbs et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Deshae Anthony
Defendant:
Mary Cobbs, B Dowd, Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quarles v. Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv00376
Plaintiff:
Kristina Quarles
Defendant:
Joyce Johnson, George Belt and Mary Cobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mu'min Abdulaziz/Askew v. Danny Burl, et al
as 15-2076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mu'min Abdulaziz/Askew
Defendant - Appellee:
Danny Burl, Warden, EARU, DeAngelo Earl, Deputy Warden, EARU, David Mills, Building Manager, EARU and others
Cobb et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03922
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul Cobb and Gina Marie Cobb
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Askew v. Burl et al
as 2:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
Mu'min Abdulaziz Askew
Defendant:
Danny Burl, DeAngelo Earl, David Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Williams et al
as 5:2012cv00377
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kimble
Defendant:
Stephen Williams, Mary Cobbs, McAfee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Fletcher Jackson, The et al v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2012cv02101
Plaintiff:
Estate of Fletcher Jackson, The , Mary Cobb-Jackson , Michelle Heard and others
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Ersie Joyner, III, Cesar Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Adams , Thomas Adams , Jacqueline Alexander and others
Defendant:
Bally Gaming, Inc. , Cadillac Jack, Inc. , IGT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crite v. Moore et al
as 5:2010cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jerbace Crite
Defendant:
Greg Moore, Mary Cobbs and Banister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIDSON v. COBB
as 5:2009cv00321
Plaintiff:
DAVID E DAVIDSON
Defendant:
MARY COBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
