Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Thomas v. Groom et al
as 5:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
James Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, James Burkes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv01363
Plaintiff:
Jessica Marie Groom
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lewis Robinson and Little Six
Defendant:
Captain Mary Groom, Unit Manager Brown, Correctional Officer Harrington and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Grooms et al
as 2:2014cv03531
Plaintiff:
State Farm Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mary Grooms, Jerry Hayes and Parks Funeral Homes Inc
Cross_claimant:
Jerry Hayes
Cross_defendant:
Mary Grooms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrothers v. Perkins et al
as 5:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carrothers
Defendant:
Erikize Perkins, Mary Groom, Victoria Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Epps et al
as 5:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Lisa Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Smith v. W.C.C.F., et al
as 11-60732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
J BANKS, Warden, G WALKER, Warden, BURKHALTER, Nurse and others
Jarvis v. Epps et al
as 5:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Virgil Lamont Jarvis
Defendant:
Chris Epps, Jack Garner, Unknown Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
