Cases 1 - 10 of 1,444
Mata v. State of Arizona
as 3:2024cv50183
Defendant:
State of Arizona and City of Chandler
Plaintiff:
Christian Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian Mata v. Amazon.com Services LLC, et al
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN MATA
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHANDLER ARIZONA
Mata v. United States of America
as 24-1264
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MATA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lopez et al v. Jennie's Kitchen LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Lopez, Margarita Alvarez, Leticia Mata Lazaro and others
Defendant:
Jennie's Kitchen LLC doing business as Jennie's Kitchen, Jennifer Denise Pineda and Erik Pineda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Moore v. Lofgren et al
as 1:2024cv03618
Plaintiff:
Ce'Andre D Moore
Defendant:
M Lofgren, Yuhas, T Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Norstar Club Inc et al
as 4:2024cv01616
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Norstar Club Inc doing business as The Other Bar and Virginia A. Mata doing business as The Other Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Lara et al v. Parker Medical Group, PLLC
as 3:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lara and Maria Mata
Defendant:
Parker Medical Group, PLLC
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mata et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Sonia Mata and Gilbert Lopez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
