Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MCGHEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25861
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CORNEL MCGHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNEZ v. NORRIS et al
as 5:2019cv00408
Defendant:
WARDEN JANINE L. QUIGLEY, MATTHEW CORNELL, DAVID KOPE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Hartford
as 17-3150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Fabian Edwards, Kenville Edwards, KeithMichael Mitto and others
Defendant:
Matthew Cornell, Officer, Eric Baumgarten, James Rovella and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of Hartford
Ozzborn v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2017cv01039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ozzborn
Defendant:
The State of New York , The New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Matthew Cornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
Donnesia Brown
Defendant:
The State of New York , The New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Matthew Cornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Hartford
as 17-1682
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Fabian Edwards, Kenville Edwards, KeithMichael Mitto and others
Defendant:
Matthew Cornell, Officer, Eric Baumgarten, City of Hartford and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Christopher May, Officer
Cornell v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2016cv00542
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cornell
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility and Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornell v. O'Reilly et al
as 3:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cornell
Defendant:
Kevin O'Reilly and Timothy Broden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards et al v. Hartford et al
as 3:2013cv00878
Plaintiff:
Fabian Edwards , Kenville Edwards , KeithMichael Mitto and others
Defendant:
City of Hartford , James Rovella , Matthew Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
