Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Little v. South Carolina Dept of Corr Cooperation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv01177
Plaintiff: David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant: South Carolina Dept. of Corr. Corporation, Kershaw Corr. Inst., Warden James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00672
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Holmes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03377
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Brittney Holmes, Elizabeth Young, Donna Lo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
HOLMES et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv00513
Plaintiff: BRITTNEY HOLMES, ELIZABETH YOUNG, DONNA LO and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, ANGUS FIRE, AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER - MDNC
as 1:2021cv00191
Respondent: UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER - MDNC
Petitioner: MATTHEW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Britt v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2021cv00159
Defendant: Sheriff Chad McBride, Christopher Rager, Anderson County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff: Sherry Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robinson v. Ford et al
as 8:2020cv03626
Plaintiff: Chad Robinson
Defendant: Tiffany Campbell, Trionda Mungo, James Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Smith
as 5:2018hc02051
Petitioner: Matthew Davis
Respondent: Donna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In Re: Matthew Davi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1831
Petitioner: In re: MATTHEW DAVIS
:
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2016cv01010
Petitioner: MATTHEW DAVIS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?