Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Matthew Jones v. Judicial Branch of United States Government
as 24-5090
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Judicial Branch of United States Government
Jones v. RI State Police, et al
as 24-1246
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND STATE POLICE and HOPKINTON POLICE
JONES v. JUDICIAL BRANCH OF U.S. GOVERNMENT
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
JUDICIAL BRANCH OF U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Wolfe et al v. Looper et al
as 1:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Paul Schroth Wolfe, John Doe, Yorkville Investment I, LLC and others
Defendant:
Steven E. Looper, Paul Schlieve, Paul Whinnery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Takefman v. The Pickleball Club LLC et al
as 1:2023cv24252
Plaintiff:
Earl Takefman
Defendant:
The Pickleball Club LLC and Matthew Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
JONES v. PA STATE POLICE DEPT. TROOP B
as 2:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
PA STATE POLICE DEPT. TROOP B
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jones v. Discover Bank
as 1:2023cv15420
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Jones v. RI State Police et al
as 1:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
RI State Police and Hopkinton Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Jones v. F M Dill Farms
as 1:2023cv02928
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
F M Dill Farms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jones v. Greene County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriff's Department and Cornell University Campus Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
